The blockbuster film "Barbie" recently received eight Oscar nominations, including a best picture nomination. Some people, however, are outraged by the fact that the film did not secure nominations for best actress (Margot Robbie) and best director (Greta Gerwig). Despite Robbie being nominated as a producer for best picture and Gerwig receiving a nod for best adapted screenplay, fans and even Hillary Clinton have voiced their displeasure.

But why can't fans and attention-hungry politicians understand that certain elements of a film, such as costumes and screenplay, may be more deserving of recognition than others? Instead of celebrating America Ferrera's nomination for best supporting actress, proud feminists are focused on the snub for best actress.

Additionally, Ryan Gosling, who plays Ken in the film, has been the center of attention for most of the award season buzz.

Furthermore, the Oscars are not as consequential as the Senate or the Supreme Court. It is merely a ceremony with declining ratings. The exclusion of Robbie and Gerwig from certain categories makes sense when considering their performances in comparison to other nominees. Robbie's portrayal of a plastic toy does not measure up to the more human and complex performances of actresses like Emma Stone and Lily Gladstone.

As for Gerwig, the fact that "Barbie" received a best picture nomination but not a best director nomination is simply due to the number of slots available. There are 10 picture slots but only five for directors. Other celebrated directors, both male and female, were also snubbed this year.

In conclusion, the outrage over the Oscar nominations for "Barbie" is uncalled for. The film's popularity should not overshadow the level of acting and directing displayed in other nominated films. It's time to move on and accept that not every film can be recognized in every category.