A potential film adaptation of Brandon Sanderson's Mistborn series would have an extensive story to tell, but if executed correctly, it could explore the narrative that HBO's Game of Thrones was hesitant to delve into. Running from 2011 to 2019, Game of Thrones swiftly gained immense popularity, becoming one of the most beloved television shows of all time. It is not surprising considering the similar fame and adoration garnered by George R.R. Martin's books. Yet, while Martin's series remains incomplete, Game of Thrones concludes without fully unraveling its most intriguing tale.

One of the remarkable aspects that sets Game of Thrones apart as a fantasy series is its penchant for subverting expectations and portraying morally complex characters.

In this regard, Mistborn shares a similarity, yet Sanderson's books weave a storyline that Game of Thrones fails to explore thoroughly. If Mistborn ever finds its way onto the silver screen, it has the potential to delve deeper into this narrative arc, unearthing what might have unfolded following Game of Thrones' most significant plot twist in season 8.

Mistborn effectively subverts the common fantasy trope of "heroes always winning." While Game of Thrones does present villains who redeem themselves and heroes who succumb to villainy, it neglects to adequately explore the latter theme. Despite the brutal and unfair world depicted in Game of Thrones, its heroes ultimately triumph in HBO's adaptation of Westeros, even if it takes several seasons to accomplish.

This is precisely why Daenerys Targaryen's descent in Game of Thrones' ending feels unsatisfying. The show fails to build it up effectively and neglects to explore the consequences of Daenerys assuming the Iron Throne. Game of Thrones swiftly disposes of her character, promptly bequeathing the crown to Bran Stark in its series finale.

In contrast, Mistborn turns this fantasy trope on its head. While its main characters do emerge victorious in the present-day timeline, Sanderson's books revolve around a hero who ultimately becomes the villain. In a way, Mistborn picks up where Game of Thrones' penultimate episode concludes: with a tyrant ascending the throne.

The Lord Ruler, the primary antagonist in the initial Mistborn installment, is explored through journal entries throughout the novel. Although a significant twist reveals his true identity, he initially starts as someone committed to saving the world. Unfortunately, his actions worsen the state of affairs.

Mistborn, unlike Game of Thrones season 8, wholeheartedly embraces its hero-to-villain story. While the HBO series allows viewers to know and cherish Daenerys leading up to her descent into villainy, it fails to thoroughly explore her transformation into a villain. She conveys her plans to her army, leading Jon and Tyrion to take action, but the show does not provide a comprehensive depiction of her capabilities as a villain.

The series concludes prematurely to delve into this aspect. However, Mistborn can approach this narrative in its unique manner.

A Mistborn film could successfully intertwine flashbacks of Alendi's journey, fleshing out the young hero and his companions, while concurrently showcasing his horrendous rule as the leader of the Final Empire in the present-day storyline. This approach would offer a complex and gripping perspective on a villain and allow Mistborn to delve deeper into profound questions concerning morality and good intentions.

By providing a thought-provoking exploration of its complicated villain, Mistborn could achieve what Game of Thrones failed to accomplish in its final season.

A well-crafted film adaptation has the potential to resonate with audiences, capturing the essence of Sanderson's captivating narrative and inviting individuals to examine the complexities of morality.